droqen's forum-shaped notebook

On art => Close reading => Topic started by: droqen on September 20, 2021, 05:28:03 PM

Title: re: Recognizing Play
Post by: droqen on September 20, 2021, 05:28:03 PM
"Recognizing Play" (https://letterclub.games/2021/09/06/recognizing-play/)
Jack Kutilek
, on letterclub.games
Title: Re: re: Recognizing Play
Post by: droqen on September 20, 2021, 05:29:36 PM
This was a really impactful read. I'm going to go through it sometime but not right now.
Title: Re: re: Recognizing Play
Post by: droqen on September 21, 2021, 12:31:50 PM
QuoteAshbury himself can't articulate what they are about. They are the ideas in their purest form, presented in words as best as he could manage. They are their own explanation.
link (https://letterclub.games/2021/09/06/recognizing-play/#:~:text=Ashbury%20himself%20can%E2%80%99t%20articulate%20what%20they%20are%20about.%20They%20are%20the%20ideas%20in%20their%20purest%20form%2C%20presented%20in%20words%20as%20best%20as%20he%20could%20manage.%20They%20are%20their%20own%20explanation.)

This is in that space of "truths that maybe can't be turned into bricks". To say that something is an idea in its purest form is, of course, metaphor. I am tempted to break down the metaphor here, and describe what its constituent parts are. But a dissected frog dies, and metaphors are tools for the brain...

What's to be done?